假如我有一只神筆作文200字（精選50篇）

　　Dear Dr. or Prof. XXXX (family name of the Editor or Editor-in-Chief who issued the decision letter),

　　Thank you very much for your letter and advice. We have revised the manuscript, and would like to re-submit it for your consideration. We have addressed the comments raised by the reviewers, and the amendments are highlighted in red in the revised manuscript. Point by point responses to the reviewers’ comments are listed below this letter.

　　This manuscript has been edited and proofread by Medjaden Bioscience Limited.

　　We hope that the revised version of the manuscript is now acceptable for publication in your journal.

　　I look forward to hearing from you soon.

　　With best wishes,

　　Yours sincerely,

　　XXXX (name of the corresponding author)

　　We would like to express our sincere thanks to the reviewers for the constructive and positive comments.

　　Replies to Reviewer 1

　　Specific Comments

　　Comment 1：

　　Answer：

　　Comment 2：

　　Answer：

　　Comment 3：

　　Answer：

　　Replies to Reviewer 2

　　Specific Comments

　　Comment 1：

　　Answer：

　　Comment 2：

　　Answer：

　　Comment 3：

　　Answer：

　　(a) 首先，要把編輯評(píng)委提出的修改意見(jiàn)逐條列出。 建議這里直接quote對(duì)方的原文， 比如象這樣：

　　"The reference to Bianchi's model published in 2000 is a bit obsolete, even Bianchi has produced and published (in this same publication) a better model."

　　這樣直接quote對(duì)方的原文，表明你并沒(méi)有歪曲，修改對(duì)方的意見(jiàn)，是對(duì)方的一種尊重。

　　(b) 然后開(kāi)始回答你是如何針對(duì)這個(gè)意見(jiàn)來(lái)修改你的文章。

　　(b-1)首先，你要寫(xiě)出你對(duì)編輯評(píng)委意見(jiàn)的理解：

　　Reviewer 1 requires that we should update our reference to Bianchi's work.

　　(b-2) 指出我們?cè)跊](méi)有修改前，我們是如何寫(xiě)的。

　　In our previously submitted draft, we use the following reference to Bianchi's work:

　　[3] G. Bianchi, "Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function", IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 535-547, 2000.

　　(b-3) 闡述你針對(duì)這個(gè)意見(jiàn)做了什么事。 比如這個(gè)意見(jiàn)是說(shuō)我給出的一個(gè)reference太舊。 我就說(shuō)明我上網(wǎng)去查閱了專門(mén)的數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)，列舉查到的結(jié)果， 并對(duì)結(jié)果進(jìn)行解釋和說(shuō)明：

　　We checked IEEE Xplore database and found two Bianchi's letters mentioned by Reviewer 1:

　　1. G.Bianchi, “IEEE 802.11-saturation throughput analysis", Communications Letters, IEEE, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 318-320, 1998.

　　2. G.Bianchi, I.Tinnirello, ”Remarks on IEEE 802.11 DCF performance analysis ", Communications Letters, IEEE Volume: 9 Issue: 8 Aug 2005

　　Page(s): 765- 767.

　　The frst letter is the short letter version of [3]. The second letter proposes a non-Markov chain approach for IEEE 802.11 DCF analysis.

　　Extensive work have been done on analyzing IEEE 802.11 DCF performance. Most of them use a Markov chain approach based on Bianchi's work in [3], and accordingly [3] are frequently mentioned in publications in this area.

　　Our analytical model also uses Markov chain approach, which is still based on Bianchi's work in [3]. Thus it is reasonable that we should mention it. Also compared with Bianchi's letter published in 1998, more details are presented in [3]. Thus we decide to mention [3] instead of that letter as [3] can help readers better understand Bianchi's work as well as our work.

　　Regarding Bianchi's second letter published in 2005, it contributes a new approach to analyzing the performance of IEEE 802.11 DCF. Elementary probability theory instead of complicated Markov chain is used in this letter. However, this work still ignores the effect of using data rate switching as most other work in this area do. It is diffcult for us to list numerous publications in this area due to the limited space. Therefore, in this draft, we only list the closely related publication (reference [3]), because we used this work in our analysis.

　　(b-4) 如果我針對(duì)這個(gè)意見(jiàn)對(duì)文章做出一定的修改，應(yīng)該列舉出對(duì)應(yīng)的修改：

　　The related statement in the revised draft is as follow (referred to Paragraph 2, Section I):

　　“Despite extensive work on analyzing the performance of IEEE 802.11 DCF, most of them consider stations use a single data rate only and the effect of using DRS has been largely ignored, such as that in [3]."

　　寫(xiě)這種response letter時(shí)要注意語(yǔ)氣，表現(xiàn)出禮貌。 最好要說(shuō)一些"We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments"之類(lèi)的客套話在(b-1)部分。此外，很有可能對(duì)方給的意見(jiàn)你本人不贊同(比如上面的例子)，這時(shí)更要注意語(yǔ)氣，同時(shí)給出詳細(xì)可靠的數(shù)據(jù)證和充足的理由解釋你為什么不贊同對(duì)方的看法(b-3)。 當(dāng)然，為了照顧對(duì)方的情緒，可以在文中加一兩句無(wú)關(guān)痛癢的話來(lái)cover對(duì)方的意見(jiàn)，如同我在上面的例子中(b-4)做的那樣。

　　如果對(duì)方的意見(jiàn)確實(shí)是正確的和很有幫助的，在(b-1)更加要毫不吝嗇的發(fā)表贊同的話，在(b-2)部分，可以用“incorrect"這類(lèi)負(fù)面意義的詞來(lái)形容自己以前文章中的相關(guān)內(nèi)容， 表明自己深刻認(rèn)識(shí)到這個(gè)錯(cuò)誤。此外，(b-3)(b-4)可以合并，要詳細(xì)介紹你是如何針對(duì)這個(gè)意見(jiàn)修改文章的， 不要再浪費(fèi)過(guò)多時(shí)間來(lái)為你以前文章做辯護(hù)。

【假如我有一只神筆作文200字】相關(guān)文章：

假如我有一只神筆作文（精選30篇）12-30

假如我有一只神筆作文（精選26篇）04-15

假如我有一只神筆想象作文（精選62篇）11-08

假如我有一只馬良的神筆作文（精選17篇）11-16

假如我有一只馬良神筆作文（精選38篇）01-10

假如我有一只神筆作文（通用76篇）01-21

假如我有馬良的神筆作文01-28

實(shí)用的假如我有馬良的神筆作文01-28

假如我有馬良的神筆小學(xué)作文02-23

假如我有一只馬良的神筆作文500字范文（精選20篇）11-27